United Nations Security Counci essays

United Nations Security Counci essays Does veto power have a future in the United Nations Security Council? Perhaps the answer to this question would become clearer if it was reformatted to reflect the true question that lies at the heart of this matter. Will the major powers that possess veto power relinquish that authority for the sake of the greater development of a less centrally dominated, more egalitarian United Nations which would be more suited to become the central actor in international law and order? Although this analysis of the issue of veto power in the UNSC may seem harsh it is essentially the truth. The removal or at least the modification of the veto power would only lead to power being shared between a larger number of UN member countries. It would also likely lead to quicker and greater action taken against regimes that commit human rights abuses and other violations of international law. Although this would lead to a better UN which would be far more capable of acting as the chief facilitator of inter national law the political ramifications of eliminating the veto and the loss of direct power experienced by the major powers that hold the veto prevent any reform from taking place and will likely continue to prevent reform in the future. The best way to achieve progress in this matter is by offering moderate reforms that still allow for major powers to continue to wield major power but remove the absolute power that is found in the veto. Before one can realize the political ramifications of removing the veto it is important that the power that is connected with the veto be fully understood. While advocates of multi-veto systems or weighted systems have much credibility in their proposed systems it must be recognized that while these proposals may seem moderate any removal of the single veto system constitutes the loss of unparalleled power. The single veto system which is used today offers the countries that posses it the supreme authority to s...